I suppose they haven’t learned anything from the last beat down skeptics gave them on their Statue of Liberty Fiasco

Bjørn Lomborg writes: 

National Geographic is at it again. They present the world “if all the ice melted” — and they have the temerity to suggest it will happen with more global warming.

“If we continue adding carbon to the atmosphere, we’ll very likely create an ice-free planet, with an average temperature of perhaps 80 degrees Fahrenheit instead of the current 58.”

This, of course, is only the outcome of continuing ever larger carbon emissions for many hundreds of years, something that no one is realistically expecting.

Could we please have a sensible, non-scare conversation back at the venerable National Geographic?

National Geographic’s last scare: http://on.fb.me/1iJR5t6

And here is their new one: http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2013/09/rising-seas/if-ice-melted-map

===============================================================

[Anthony] Meanwhile both Arctic and Antarctic ice are within normal parameters of standard deviation:

Arctic is about 1 standard deviation below the average line:

The Antarctic is above two standard deviations:

Globally, sea ice is at normal:

Related articles

• The ice is not melting, yet still the scaremongers blunder on (junkscience.com)
• National Geographic rising sea level prophecy – cause for concern or absurd fairytale? (wattsupwiththat.com)